Squandering talent: Directors who’ve lost it, Part 1
November 12th, 2008Being a movie director can be a pretty thankless job. Overbearing producers, prima donna actors, studio interference, it just doesn’t seem worth the hassle. Of course, directors are artists, attempting to rein in their cast and crew to produce a staggering work of heartbreaking genius. Every so often, a director comes along who really creates a brilliant piece of work. Sometimes they manage to follow it up with another. Sometimes they have a run of sheer brilliance, creating films of amazing depth and emotion, eliciting beautiful performances from their actors. Unfortunately, sometimes these auteurs get a little over their heads and descend into hubris. Every director makes a bad film, that’s a fact. Not everything committed to celluloid will be a masterpiece. But these directors have released such crap in recent times, it’s hard to believe they were once considered the cream of Hollywood. The first to make this most dishonourable list: Barry Levinson.
Seriously, what happened to this guy? I mean, he won an Oscar for Christ’s sake. I know that’s not saying much now, but gimme a break. He should be doing better.
Starting with Diner, Levinson released several films in the 1980s that seemed to capture the sense of the decade. Diner was a beautifully composed little film, focusing on a group of friends who help each other through that difficult passage from carefree youth to responsible adult. That it starred future Hollywood luminaries like Kevin Bacon and Mickey Rourke showed what an eye for talent Levinson had. He followed this up with The Natural, a decent baseball flick with an iconic final scene. He seemed to hit his stride a little later, teaming up with Robin Williams for Good Morning Vietnam, harnessing the talent of Tom Cruise and Dustin Hoffman for Rain Man, and making what is arguably Warren Beatty’s last great film with Bugsy.
The first misstep was Toys, a giant mess of a film. Robin Williams, high on a string of hit films, seemed out of control. LL Cool J was a seriously miscast. Joan Cusack was delightful, and the only shining light to be found. It rightfully bombed. Then there was Jimmy Hollywood, an attempt at satirizing Hollywood. Unfortunately, the comedy fell flat, despite Joe Pesci giving a very funny performance.
Levinson seemed to bounce back a bit with a decent adaptation of Michael Crichton’s novel Disclosure. He followed that with one of my favourite films of the 90s, Sleepers. Here was the Levinson of old, complete with a compelling story, flawed characters, and a bittersweet ending.
He’s made nothing as compelling since. In 1998, Levinson attempted to make another movie based on a Crichton novel, Sphere. It really sucked. Ten years later, the film is utterly forgettable, complete with lacklustre special effects. Bandits, in 2001, was another disappointment, wasting the talents of Cate Blanchett.
Of course, these cinematic disasters were nothing compared to Envy. I’ll admit to being particularly intrigued by the trailer. I still wasn’t tired of Ben Stiller’s whiny mensch schtick just yet and I really liked Jack Black a few months earlier in School of Rock. My fascination with Amy Poehler was still in its infancy. I dragged a friend of mine to it a few days after it opened. Suffice to say, I was embarrassed. I was expecting something silly, but smartly written. What I got was an incredibly stupid comedy that reduced its characters to caricature and concluded with an insultingly preachy ending. Fun Fact #1 about Envy: Its release was delayed almost two years because of poor test screening results. Fun Fact #2: Jack Black publicly apologized for the movie a few months after it was released.
Levinson has been pretty quiet since then, releasing only Man of the Year in 2006. A very unfunny movie starring Robin Williams as a Jon Stewart-esque late night funnyman who wins the US presidency by a fluke, it was out of theatres just six weeks after its release.
Where did Levinson go wrong? Who knows? Maybe it was leaving Baltimore, the city where he shot and set a lot of his films. Baltimore isn’t the prettiest city in the U.S., but Levinson made it look good. Maybe it was taking on projects that moved him away from the intimate character-driven pieces that made his early films so good. Sphere was a horrendous cacophony of special effects and not much else.
If you look at Diner or Rain Man, you see what Levinson did well. He created great moments between his characters. The football quiz in Diner. Ray and Charlie dancing in their Las Vegas penthouse in Rain Man. These are classic scenes in the Hollywood canon. I haven’t had a chance to see What Just Happened yet, but I am hoping it will be a return to form.
Coming up next: John McTiernan and how he went from action movie visionary to hack.



















